A visualizer for deep Bible study

One subject at the centre, six facets orbiting it: where and when it happened, what the words are doing, what you can look at, and where scholars still disagree. Each prototype is a phone screen you can tap through.

One screen runs on real data and shows only what it can verify. The rest are interface prototypes whose citations are unverified placeholders.

RUNNING ON REAL DATA

LIVE · ACTS 2:42

Verse visualizer

The orbit reading real scripture in four translations, with a working Still argued: five named commentators, three positions, and a flat contradiction between Gill and Jamieson-Fausset-Brown about whether "the breaking of bread" is the Lord's Supper. Open check the source on any quote to see it highlighted inside that commentator's full note. The other five facets are empty and say what they are waiting on.

Open

DESIGN PROTOTYPES — NIGHTFALL

VERSE

Verse visualizer

Acts 2:42 holds the middle while six facets orbit on a ring tilted nearly flat, so they sweep in front of the verse and pass behind it. Drag to spin, and it snaps on release. The tray below follows whichever card is at the front.

Open

TOPIC

Topic view

Fellowship, or κοινωνία. The same orbit around a different kind of subject: three facets carry over from the verse view and three are new. Where and when, see it, and still argued never move.

Open

LANDING

Discovery

Where a session starts. Search at the top, a few hand-edited tiles under it, then catalog rails that scroll sideways. Curated work carries the voice; the rails do the scale.

Open

EARLIER PASSES

THIRD PASS · LIGHT THEME

Verse visualizer, flat

The six facets before the orbit tilted. Tap a bubble and it rotates to the top. Superseded, but it is the clearest record of how the facet set settled.

Open

SECOND PASS · LIGHT THEME

One verse, two depths

A plain reading page on the first tap, a map of related passages on the second, shown side by side to argue that the depth is optional. The first sketch of the trust split, in red and blue.

Open

FIRST PASS · LIGHT THEME

Word study into a map

Starts from a Greek word study grouped by sense rather than canonical order, then opens into a map of semantically nearby verses. Kept because the sense-grouping idea is still worth arguing about.

Open

How to read the colours.

Gold is retrieved — a lexicon, a morphology database, a cross-reference set, a named commentary. Cited and checkable.
Violet is written by the model, always reasoned from the gold above it, never floating free.
Nothing else. On the live screen, a facet with no checked source shows as empty rather than filled with something plausible.

What to look at.

Whether you would tap past the reading page at all, or stop at the first screen.
Whether the orbit tells you anything a ranked list wouldn't.
Whether the split between sourced fact and model interpretation reads clearly without being explained.
Whether still argued — naming the positions instead of flattening them into one answer — is the reason you would come back.